I Am An Evil Super GENIUS!!!: Chavs' Army

Earlier today, I saw an advertisement from the BBC requesting people to submit their ideas for the new series of one of my favourite Radio Four shows, Dave Gorman's Genius. Never one to pass up a golden opportunity for self-advancement like this, I submitted this politically incorrect but brilliant Genius idea:

Sending chavs abroad to fight our wars.

My Genius idea is to send Britain's chavs abroad to fight in Iraq, Afghanistan and other trouble-spots. This would kill three birds with one stone as not only would it cut crime at home, but the chavs and Al-Qaeda would also wipe-out each other on the desert battlefields.

My Genius idea would save taxpayers billions as chavs wouldn't need uniforms (they're already instantly recognisable by their hooded tops, Burberry and fake bling), high-tech weaponry (as most chavs already carry their own guns, knives, baseball bats and broken beer bottles) or training (as they spend hundreds of hours playing Grand Theft Auto IV and Halo 3 on their X-Box 360s and kill each other for real on the streets).

We could even sell our chavs' services to foreign powers such the United States in their quest to invade Iran, Syria and North Korea in order to bring in some extra revenue for the government.

In conclusion, chavs are cheap, expendable cannon fodder. They would obey orders without question because chavs are either drunk, high on drugs, stupid or all three. It would cut crime at home while simultaneously providing our enemies with an inexhaustible supply of violent, fearless and beer-soaked infidels from council-housing estates to eliminate during their martyrdom missions. The only costs that would be incurred by my Genius idea would be transportation and the government subsiding free beer for chavs to consume at recruitment events across Britain’s council-housing estates.

Roars Of Silence Heard In Rose Hill, Oxfordshire

Despite the scandal of the Home Secretary Jacqui "Smith" Spliff attempting to deport gays and lesbians back to certain arrest, torture and execution in Islamofascist Iran, there is been no word of condemnation against Spliff's actions by the supposedly lesbian Labour Councillor for Rose Hill, Oxfordshire, Antonia Bance.

Could it be that little Miss Bance just doesn't give a damn about LGBT rights? Is she in fact a faux-lesbian?!? Or is it that Antonia cares more about "Working Towards The Führer" than standing up her princples (if she has any, other than the pursuit of absolute power for her tribe). I bet that if it was a Tory or Liberal Democrat Home Secretary that was deporting homosexuals to Iran, we would have had day after day of blog posts from Miss Bance expressing her righteous indignation at the "baby-eating homophobes".

This sort of hypocrisy is a typical play from the Gospel According To St. Terry Kelly. There are two morals to draw from Miss Bance's deafening silence:

1) It's okay to deport homosexuals back to their deaths in Iran and Cuba, so long as it is done by the Labour party.

2) If you're a gay or lesbian fighting against deportation back to a country that will kill you because of your sexual orientation, don't count on any support from Antonia Bance.

Jacqui "Smith" Spliff - A Jew-Hating Racist As Well As A Homophobe

Not content with deporting gays and lesbians back to certain arrest, torture and execution in Islamofascist Iran, our ex-druggie of a Home Secretary has also decided to ban the deputy leader of the Jewish Likud Party from entering Britain.

I hope she gets knocked down by a bus, the bus reserves back over her, then it drives forwards over her crushed corpse again.

Israel Is Evil (According To Terry Kelly)

I sometimes wonder if the infamous Cllr Terry Kelly lives on the same planet as the rest of us. Take this question I asked him for example:

"Are you aware that Israel is the only true democray in the Middle East, surrounded by half-a-dozen Arab and Islamic dictatorships that would love nothing more than finish what Hitler started (not that they would admit to there being a holocaust in the first place)?

Under those circumstances, Israel has every right to defend itself against such aggression."

However, the self-appointed champion of the Palestinian people sees it differently:

"I can’t see anything or anyone in the Middle East that comes anywhere near the crimes committed by Israel."

This remark though has me questioning his sanity:

"They are not a good advert for democracy, they are the cause of the problem ."

And Cuba is?!?

Jacqui "Smith" Spliff Is A Homophobe & An Accessory To State-Sanctioned Murder

Paul Canning explains why here. No doubt Terry Kelly, fan of the homophobic murderer Fidel Castro would approve of Spliff's actions.

Archbishop's sharia comments:"Recipe for disaster"

LONDON (Reuters) - A government minister accused Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams of concocting "a recipe for disaster" for suggesting the introduction in Britain of some aspects of sharia was unavoidable.

Main political parties distanced themselves from Thursday's comments on Islamic law by Williams, the spiritual leader of the world's 77 million Anglicans, who is already battling divisions within his church over gay priests.

"You cannot run two systems of law alongside each other. That would be a recipe for chaos," said Culture Secretary Andy Burnham, joining a chorus of condemnation for Williams.

Nick Clegg, leader of the Liberal Democrats, said "On this I think he is wrong" while former Home Secretary David Blunkett said formalising Islamic law "would be catastrophic in terms of social cohesion".

The Sun said on Friday: "It's easy to dismiss Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams as a silly old goat. In fact he's a dangerous threat to our nation."

The issue of integrating Britain's 1.8 million Muslims has been widely debated since July 2005, when four British Islamists carried out suicide bombings on London's transport system, killing 52 people.

Those attacks prompted questioning of a long-standing policy of avoiding a single British identity and promoting a multicultural society, which some argue has led to segregation of ethnic minorities.

Speaking to the BBC, Williams said other religions enjoyed tolerance of their laws in Britain and called for a "constructive accommodation" with Muslim practice in areas such as marital disputes.

Asked if the adoption of some aspects of sharia was necessary for community cohesion, he said: "It seems unavoidable."

His unexpected comments were welcomed by some Muslim groups, but the government said it was out of the question that the principles of sharia could be used in British civil courts.

"The prime minister is clear that in Britain, British laws based on British values will apply," a spokesman for Prime Minister Gordon Brown said.

Sharia is the body of Islamic religious law based on the Koran, the words and actions of the Prophet Mohammad and his companions, and rulings of Islamic scholars. It covers issues including worship, commercial dealings, marriage and penal laws.

Williams said he was not endorsing the harsh punishments meted out in countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, where murderers and drug traffickers are publicly beheaded or hanged.

But that did not placate critics.

Trevor Phillips, chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, called Williams' intervention "muddled and unhelpful".

"Raising this idea will give fuel to anti-Muslim extremism," he added.

And Labour MP Khalid Mahmood had no doubt about where he stood: "I, along with the vast majority of UK Muslims, oppose any such move to introduce sharia here. British law is the envy of the world."

Lord Carey defends Islam comments

The former Archbishop of Canterbury has defended a speech made in Rome in which he accused Islamic societies of contributing little to the world.

Lord Carey said his lecture on Thursday also contained criticisms of Western culture and was a balanced appraisal of Islam and Christianity's relationship.

The former Anglican Church head told BBC's Newsnight: "I do not apologise for the things I say."

But Muslim leaders said he was "ignorant in the true faith of Islam".

Authoritarian regimes

Speaking in Rome on Thursday, Lord Carey said Islamic regimes were authoritarian and committed to power and privilege.

He said not enough moderate Muslim leaders had condemned suicide bombers.

Referring to the culture's contribution to society, he lamented the lack of any great invention saying it was 'a puzzle'.

'Muslim people are not bereft of brilliant minds. They have much to contribute to the human family,' he added.

On Friday, he told Newsnight that while he defended his comments about Muslims, he said: "I honour them as people. I honour the Muslim faith."

Iqbal Sacranie, secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, responded angrily, saying: "One is surprised to find Lord Carey recycling the same old religious prejudice in the 21st century."

Manzoor Moghal, Chairman of the Federation of Muslim Organisations in Leicester, England, where 40,000 Muslims are based, said Lord Carey's understanding was poor.

"People are going to see the whole thing in a light which will portray him as a person who is ignorant in the true faith of Islam," he added.

No! No! No!: Sharia law unavoidable - Archdruid Of Cunterbury

The adoption of some aspects of Islamic sharia law in the UK "seems unavoidable", the Archbishop of Canterbury has said.

Dr Rowan Williams said there was a place for finding a "constructive accommodation" in areas such as marriage - allowing Muslim women to avoid western divorce proceedings.

Other religions enjoyed such tolerance of their own laws, he pointed out, but stressed that it could never be allowed to take precedence over an individual's rights as a citizen.

He said it would also require a change in perception of what sharia involved beyond the "inhumanity" of extreme punishments and attitudes to women seen in some Islamic states.

Dr Williams told BBC Radio 4's The World At One: "It seems unavoidable and, as a matter of fact, certain conditions of sharia are already recognised in our society and under our law, so it is not as if we are bringing in an alien and rival system.

"We already have in this country a number of situations in which the internal law of religious communities is recognised by the law of the land as justifying conscientious objections in certain circumstances."

He added: "There is a place for finding what would be a constructive accommodation with some aspects of Muslim law as we already do with aspects of other kinds of religious law.

"It would be quite wrong to say that we could ever license a system of law for some community which gave people no right of appeal, no way of exercising the rights that are guaranteed to them as citizens in general.

"But there are ways of looking at marital disputes, for example, which provide an alternative to the divorce courts as we understand them. In some cultural and religious settings they would seem more appropriate."

He said people needed to look at Islamic law "with a clear eye and not imagine, either, that we know exactly what we mean by sharia and just associate it with ... Saudi Arabia, or whatever".

Rowan Williams is without doubt the worst Archbishop of Canterbery in living memony. We already have a situation in Islamic countries such as Kuwait and Malasya where the decisions of the civil courts on divorce, blasphemy and conversion to a non-Islamic faith have been overruled by the religious courts and that must not be allowed to happen in this country where the law of the land has already been hampered by an unholy alliance of New Labour fascists, EU directives, the PC brigade, European Courts and the loathsome 1998 Human Rights Act.

I am not bigoted against al-Islam in general, but I must also be objective and state that 'modern' Islam as enforced by far too many so-called Muslims is as intolorant, barbaric and inhuman as medieval Christianity and until the Islamic world realises this and makes a real and concerted effort to reform their attitudes towards each other and the 'people of Kuff' (non-believers), we non-Muslims should ourselves be as uncompromising towards their own uncompromising bigotry, violence, racism and intolorance.

Iran's atomic negotiator resigns

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Chief nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani, Iran's main contact with the West over Tehran's atomic programme, has resigned, the government said on Saturday.

His shock decision exposed a rift over tactics with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who accepted his resignation and has taken a hard-line approach in Iran's long-running stand-off with the West, analysts said.

A government spokesman said there would be no change in nuclear policy. Saeed Jalili, deputy foreign minister for European and American affairs, was expected to replace Larijani, the official IRNA news agency said.

"Larijani has resigned due to personal reasons, but this does not mean changes in policies and programmes," said government spokesman Gholamhossein Elham.

The West fears Tehran wants to build atomic bombs and has imposed two sets of sanctions through the United Nations. Tehran insists it wants only to produce electricity.

Larijani, secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council and chief nuclear negotiator since 2005, had been set to meet EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana in Rome on Tuesday for more discussions about Iran's nuclear ambitions.

The European Union said the talks would go ahead. "We have just spoken to the Iranians. Solana is keeping to his plan to travel to Rome on Tuesday and will meet whatever senior negotiator the Iranians send," an EU spokeswoman said.

EU diplomats said the Iranian negotiator would be Jalili but it was unclear whether he had yet been formally appointed.

European officials say Larijani has long had difficulty in getting the Iranian establishment to support his negotiating strategy.

Iranian analysts have said Larijani had differences with Ahmadinejad over tactics although both oppose halting the nuclear programme in the face of increasing Western concern and threats of more sanctions.

One analyst said Larijani's departure and the appointment of Jalili, viewed as close to the president, suggested the growing ascendancy of hard-line voices opposed to a more pragmatic line, which he said Larijani backed.

Major powers have agreed to delay new sanctions until November. They want to see if Iran's deal with U.N. inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) about Tehran's intentions yields results and to await a report by Solana.

Washington has refused to rule out the use of force if diplomacy fails to resolve the dispute.

Russia supports "direct dialogue" with Tehran and President Vladimir Putin said this week he saw no evidence Iran's programme had military aims.

NO OBSTACLE

Elham, quoted by ISNA, said he did not rule out Larijani attending Tuesday's talks in Rome.

"Despite Larijani's resignation, there will be no change in the council's programme and the new secretary will meet Javier Solana," he said. "There is no obstacle for Mr Larijani's presence in the talks."

The final say in Iran in all matters of state, including nuclear policy, lies with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Analysts say he tends to look for a consensus among several different political camps to reach decisions.

"This (Larijani's resignation) will show that the hard-line position, the defiant position of Iran will continue and there will not be much chance of any change in the Iranian position," said one Iranian analyst who declined to be named.

Larijani may have felt he nothing more to offer in talks with Solana, the analyst said. "The president left no more room for Larijani to manoeuvre and negotiate."

Ahmadinejad, whose rhetoric about the nuclear issue has angered Western governments, has said Iran's nuclear file is closed, though Iran is ready to answer outstanding questions from the IAEA about its programme.

The United Nations has demanded Iran suspend uranium enrichment, a process which can be used to make fuel for power plants or, if Iran wanted, material for warheads.

Iran has repeatedly refused to comply. It has turned a cold shoulder to other mooted proposals such as a "timeout" where Iran would stop expanding its enrichment work in return for the West halting moves to impose more sanctions.

"The IAEA is working with a group of technical counterparts in Iran," a spokesperson for the International Atomic Energy Agency said on Saturday, declining to be named or to comment any further.

Note To George W. Bush: Attack Iran before it gets the bomb and uses it to nuke Israel!

Quote of the Day 3.10.2007

"New Liebour pro moslem, pro terrorist, anti-semitic, pro parasitic illegal migrants." - FIDO The Dog

It's True! It's Damn True!

Adolf Blair Brings More Chaos To The Middle-East

I bet the Iranians just love him for doing their dirty work for them. Blair The Antichrist always wanted to be just like his Austrian hero Herr Hitler.

Recommended Reading: Saddam's Secrets by Georges Sada

For anyone who still has doubt about whether George W. Bush was right to liberate Iraq from the evil Saddam Hussein should read the former Iraqi Air Force General Georges Sada's 2006 book Saddam's Secrets. It is an essential read on Saddam, his son, his regime, his plan to wipe out Israel Nazi-style and his efforts to conceal WMDs.

The End Of The Fourth Reich & The Birth Of The Union Of Scottish Socialist Realms

Our Fuhrer, the Antichrist Adolf Blair resigns this afternoon as our master so that he can cause more chaos, death and destruction in the Middle East in according with the prophecies from the Book Of Revelations. He and his Fourth Reich will be replaced by Comrade Doctor John Gordon Macbeth Stalin Brown and his new U.S.S.R of cunts such as Harriet "Johann" Ha(i)ricunt and Alister Boring.

Bring Back Thatcher!

Terry Kelly Rewrites History

"'Iraq' my position is clear I opposed the war and I still do. 'Solve the problem' ? that's harder, an elected Iraqi government must be restored which has the respect of all Iraqi's and governs for all"

Yes, lets overthrow the democratically-elected and American-backed government and restore the Baathist tyranny that oppressed, tortured and killed it's own citizens, invaded it's neighbours, stole their oil, fired SCUD missiles at a neutral third-party just because it was predominantly Jewish and then caused an environmental disaster in the Persian Gulf Sea when it couldn't get it's own way.

El Tel needs to lie down before he hurts his fragile little mind.

Iran may face harsher U.N. sanctions in June

BERLIN (Reuters) - Iran will face further sanctions in June if it continues to defy U.N. demands that it stop uranium enrichment work, a senior U.S. official said on Wednesday.

Iran has repeatedly stated it would not give up its nuclear fuel programme which it says is aimed only at producing electricity. The West suspects Tehran wants to build bombs.

"If Iran doesn't say yes to negotiations ... they're going to find a third Security Council (sanctions) resolution in the month of June," U.S. Under Secretary of State Nicholas Burns told reporters at the U.S. embassy.

The United Nations has imposed two sets of sanctions after Iran rejected resolutions ordering it to freeze nuclear work.

Burns did not give a deadline for Iran to suspend enrichment but said if Tehran had not moved by the Group of Eight (G8) summit in early June, it would be time to increase sanctions.

The United States, Britain, France and Germany have made a full suspension of enrichment work a condition for beginning negotiations. Iran says it wants to negotiate but not if it has to freeze enrichment.

Burns is in Berlin for meetings with political directors from the G8 nations to prepare for the group's summit in Heiligendamm, Germany, and meetings on Iran with Germany and the other four permanent U.N. Security Council members -- Britain, France, Russia and China.

U.S. officials said the six world powers were originally planning to meet on Wednesday to discuss Iran. They will now meet early on Thursday. Among the discussion topics is the possible language for a sanctions resolution, diplomats said.

China would participate via telephone, Burns said.

Among possible sanctions was an increase in the number of Iranian banks to be blacklisted by the United Nations, several diplomats said.

However, German Foreign Ministry spokesman Martin Jaeger said sanctions would not be on the agenda. The powers intended to prepare for the next meeting between EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana and Iranian nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani.

Solana met Larijani recently and said the meeting was very difficult as Iran had said it had no intention of suspending uranium enrichment.

NO INTENTION

One senior official from a G8 country said the draft of a statement on nuclear non-proliferation to be approved at the summit called for increasing pressure on Iran if it remained defiant.

Under the draft, the G8 would "support adopting further measures should Iran refuse to comply with its obligations", said the official, declining to be named.

Germany is the G8 president. Other members are the United States, Russia, Britain, France, Italy, Canada and Japan.

Several diplomats said the major powers were satisfied with the impact sanctions were having and that Iranians were growing increasingly worried about the economic pressures.

But Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi dismissed on Wednesday suggestions sanctions were having an impact.

This Idiot Needs A Dishonourable Discharge

Iran hostage 'loses his passport'

One of the British navy crew held hostage by Iran has had to delay rejoining his ship after losing his passport, it has been reported.

Operator Mechanic Arthur Batchelor, 20, from Plymouth, Devon, was the youngest of the 15 sailors and Marines seized while on an anti-smuggling patrol on March 23.

The Ministry of Defence said on Monday that some of the captives would return to their ship, HMS Cornwall, in the Gulf this week.

It is understood their passports remained aboard their ship during their 13-day ordeal and were returned to their bases in Britain after they were released.

But OM Batchelor is thought to have lost his after it was returned with the rest of his kit to Royal Marines Base Chivenor in north Devon, it is reported.

An MoD spokesman said: "OM Batchelor was due to rejoin the ship but this has been delayed due to an administrative problem."

This man is an embrassment to both the Royal Navy and the nation as a whole. First he whinged about how the Iranian Islamofascists took away his iPod and cried like a wimp when they called him Mr. Bean and now he goes and does this! What on earth was he doing with an iPod when he was on-duty and what is so distressing about being called Mr. Bean?!? This moron looks more like Ian Huntley than Rowan Atkinson. Standards in the British armed forces have slipped if crybabies like him are allowed to join it, let alone allowed to continue to serve in them after making an emotional fool of himself and his colleagues.

Quote of the Day 11.4.2007

"This is what you get I suppose when "everyone is a winner" in Blairland." - Roger Thornhill on Britain's recent national humiliation at the hands of both Adolf Blair and Islamofascist Iran

Things To Do If You Are Captured By Iranian Islamofascists!

1. Respond to all of their questions with the simple phrase "fuck you arsehole!"

2. Psychically and verbally attack your captors at every available opportunity.

3. If you happen to be able to gain access to the Holy Qu'ran, open it and then urinate on its pages.

4. Taunt you captors be accusing them of buggering each other and claim that all Iran's political and religious leaders rape young boys.

5. Utter blasphemy against the Prophet Muhammad (Praised Be His Name).

6. Remember that if you do all of the above, the Iranians will not kill you or remove any of you limbs, because if they do, it would only increase international instability and make you a martyr. It also gives Dubya all the reason he needs to nuke those cunts off the face of the earth.

I would also like to reassure any Islamic readers of this blog that I am not an Islamophobe, I just hate the Iranian government and want to insult and piss them off at every opportunity.

Grand Âyatollâh Piper of Sandwell

The Rowdy One has given his moral support to the Islamofascists in Iran in their quest to wipeout Israel. Perhaps Bobby is jealous of Terry Kelly's reputation as the most controversial Labour councillor in the blogosphere, or maybe Cllr Piper is just an old-fashioned left-wing racist? His previous track record on race relations suggests the latter.

Question: How Do You Solve A Problem Like Iran?

FUCK YEAH!